Documents Related to the PSWID Presentations, Budget, and Expenses

Mr. Bill Haney's Resignation Letter. Submitted at the July 24th PSWID meeting. [New 7/29/2010]

Document Collection #1. Obtained by a FOIA request. [New 7/24/2010]

Document Collection #2. Obtained by a FOIA request. [New 7/24/2010]

Document Collection #3. Obtained by a FOIA request. [New 7/24/2010]

Document Collection #4. Obtained by a FOIA request. [New 7/24/2010]

Document Collection #5. These documents were provided by Mr. Levetro. [New 7/24/2010]

PSWID Contract with Attorney Mr. David Davis. [New 7/11/2010]

Mr. Harry Jones email Describing Long-term Viability of Wells. In this email Mr. Jones indicates that Milk Ranch well and Strawberry Hollow wells won't supply long-term water because the Milk Ranch well will be expensive to operate and that the Strawberry Hollow well construction will result in a shorter life. [New 7/11/2010]

Proposed Water Rate Increases for 2010-2011. [New 6/6/2010]

Proposed Budget for 2010-2011. [New 6/6/2010]

May 26th Budget Proposal Slides. Presented by Mr. Jones at the May 26th meeting as a summary of the approach to the 2010-2011 budget. [New 6/6/2010]

May 26th Statement by Mr. Mike Greer. This statement was read at the May 26th meeting accusing Mr. Haney and technical staff of attempting to block the Milk Ranch well. [New 6/6/2010]

May 26th Meeting Recording Clip. The most contentious and informative part of the meeting. [New 6/1/2010]

Highland Water Resources Letter of Resignation. [New 6/1/2010]

Tetra Tech Letter of Resignation. [New 6/1/2010]

Milk Ranch Well Connection Estimate. Estimate prepared by Tetra Tech that comes to $420,000. This covers the cost of filtration of the sand in the water and the connection to the rest of the water system. [New 6/1/2010]

Water Filitration Recommendation and Estimate. Several approaches are laid out in this McCandless Engineering report based upon the measured suspended solids in the Milk Ranch well water. A cost estimate for each approach is provided. [New 6/1/2010]

Highland Water Report. Contains an explanation of why the pump failed on May 7th after Highland's recommendations on operating the pump were ignored. [New 6/1/2010]

PSWID Proposed 2010-2011 Budget Presentation 5-8-2010. The presentation covers the anticipated spending and revenues for the 2010-2011 budget and a discussion of when and how water rate increases need to be addressed. [New 5/16/2010]

Water Sharing Agreement Summary. Main aspects of each of the water sharing agreements summarized in a table. [New 5/2/2010]

Solitude Trails Water Sharing Agreement. Relevant portions of the agreement covering the explanation of events leading to the agreement and major terms of the agreement. [New 5/2/2010]

Timber Ridge Water Sharing Agreement. Relevant portions of the agreement covering the major terms of the agreement. [New 5/2/2010]

Strawberry Hollow Well Appraisal. The summary and supplement portions of the appraisal prepared by Tetra Tech. Detailed cost sheets have not been included. [New 5/2/2010]

Drilling versus Storage Analysis. Mr. Tanner Henry of Tetra Tech presented an anlysis at the 2/18/2010 board meeting on the affect of storage and new water source additions on the availability of water through the year. [New 2/21/2010]

Ground Water Exploration Proposal. Prepared and presented by Mr. Mike Ploughe at the 2/3/2010 board meeting. Proposes a three year plan to drill three to four test wells a year and do one production well a year. [New 2/18/2010]

Proposal to Purchase Solitude Trails DWID. Presented by Mr. Mark Fumusa at the 2/3/2010 board meeting, it is a proposal by Mr. Fumusa to sell the DWID to PSWID for $500,000. [New 2/18/2010]

Corrections To Water Revenues. This shows the corrections that need to be made to the water revenues that were estimated in the Economists.com rate analyisis and the amount of additional revenue needed if the rate subsidies are removed. [New 2/2/2010]

No Gimmicks Rate Increases. This shows what the rate increases would need to be, starting in FYE 2011, if the property tax and borrowed money rate subsidies are removed. [New 2/2/2010]

Summary of Operations Cost Estimates. This provides a comparison between the Coe and Van Loo estimate of 8/18/2009, the actual average expenses that Brooke reported to the ACC, the PSWID operations cost estimate from 9/14/2009, and the corrections to the estimate by Water For Pine Strawberry. [New 1/1/2010]

PSWID Operations Cost Estimate for FY 2009-2010. Dated 09/14/2009. [New 1/1/2010]

Shaffer Water Management Contract. Dated 09/15/2009 [New 1/1/2010]

Economists.com Updated Rate Analysis. Dated 09/19/2009. It gives projection of costs and revenues through 2019. Very limited information compared to the preliminary rate analysis provided in October 2008.

PSWID Prepared Audit of 2008-2009 Fiscal Year. There are several errors in this document. See the November 29, 2009 PSWID Misc email for details.

10/15/2009 Spending and Operations Presentation. Mr. Harry Jones provided an over view of spending and operations activities.

10/15/2009 Water Resources Presentation. Given by Mr. Mike Ploughe.

10/15/2009 Rate Analysis Presentation. Presented by Mr. Dan Jackson of Economists.com.

Tentative 2009-2010 PSWID Budget. This is the tentative budget approved by the board at the June 20th meeting.

Proposed PSWID Rates for May 21, 2009 Rate Hearing
The proposed rates reflect the current rates being charged by the PWCo and SWCo water companies.

Proposed Budget Modification for 2008/2009 Fiscal Year for March 28, 2009 Meeting. This document shows the board's proposed restructuring of the current year's budget. There were several errors in the budget sheet that the board published prior to the meeting. The errors totaled $45,667.40.
Under the funds available, the carry-over from the prior fiscal year is shown as $53,096.28. The June 30th 2008 balance shown on the monthly financial statement from the PSWID website shows an actual balance of $26,954.87. The county agreed with that balance for the end of June. So funds available are overstated by $26,141.41.
Under Public Election Expense, the board failed to include the cost of the recall election, $19,552.99. This was paid on July 9th 2008 out of the reserve fund.